The state becomes a parent the moment it takes a child into care. This section sets out what that duty must mean in law, in this constituency, and for every young person who leaves the system.
There is no relationship in British public life more one-sided than the one between a child in care and the authority that holds them. The child has no choice, no lawyer on retainer, and no newspaper willing to take their side. The council is legally their parent — and almost nothing happens to it when it parents badly.
That is the gap this campaign exists to close. Social care is not a niche brief bolted onto a media accountability platform. It is the same argument: institutions that hold power over a person's life must be answerable to that person, in a forum with real consequences.
Placement stability, sibling separation, out-of-area moves, advocacy that is actually independent, and the duty to listen to a child about their own life.
Read the commitmentsCare experience as the tenth protected characteristic, the end of the cliff edge at eighteen, and protection from retaliatory criminalisation.
Read the commitmentsThe full London safeguarding procedure on children missing from care, home or education — police and council duties, the return interview, and what this seat will push for.
Read the procedureThis constituency is covered by two very different authorities — Westminster City Council and the City of London Corporation — each a corporate parent to the children in its care, each with its own children's services, its own complaints route and its own record.
An MP cannot run a children's services department, and should not pretend otherwise. What an MP can do is make the record public: publish how many looked-after children each authority places outside the borough, how long placements last, how many care leavers are in secure housing at nineteen, and how many complaints were upheld.
Care cases will not be triaged to the bottom of the constituency postbag. Any resident who is a care leaver, a foster or kinship carer, or a young person currently looked after gets a direct route into this office, and their case is taken up with the authority in writing.
Where an authority refuses to answer, the correspondence goes on the public record. Institutions behave differently when the file can be read.
Social care sits partly inside the core human rights mandate and partly outside it. Where a vote concerns the enforceability of rights for children in care, that is mandate territory and the position is fixed. Where a vote concerns funding levels, structures or local delivery choices, the constituency decides and this seat votes as the majority directs.
Register to join the secure constituency polling platform and direct how this seat votes on social care.
Register Your Vote